Volume 5The Art and Science of DeliveryDelivery is both an art and a science. We think the art is in the innovation and adaptability of the actors and different delivery models, while the science lies in replicating and scaling those models.
Volume 5The Art and Science of DeliveryDelivery is both an art and a science. We think the art is in the innovation and adaptability of the actors and different delivery models, while the science lies in replicating and scaling those models.
Volume 4The Socially Conscious ConsumerHow the global rise of socially conscious consumers can help drive environmental and economic sustainability.
Volume 3Financing Social ChangeAcross the globe, innovative new tools are helping fund social change.
Volume 2The Rise of Social MovementsTaking to the streets: The rise of the Arab Spring and Occupy Movements.
Volume 1Jobs for the young & restlessYouth around the world have been particularly hard hit, registering disturbingly high unemployment numbers.
What MattersSocial innovationCan fresh thinking solve the world’s most intractable problems?
What MattersSocial entrepreneursCan social entrepreneurs create large scale change?
What MattersCitiesAs the global population becomes increasingly urbanized, what will the cities of the future look like?
Global consumers have been flexing their purchasing muscles for political purposes since at least the 18th century. From the Boston Tea Party to Gandhi’s Salt March and today’s campaigns against conflict diamonds and fast food, we present highlights in the history of consumer activism and ask you to decide how you would have responded to each campaign. Based on your answers, we’ll tell you what kind of consumer you are.
Get Started
I would personally hurl chests of tea into the harbor. Give me liberty or give me death!
Taxation without representation is certainly unfair, but this issue should have been settled peacefully in the courts. Still, I probably would have switched to coffee
Tea and politics don't mix. Cream and sugar, please.
I would boycott all slave-made products, even if it meant paying more money for inferior goods.
I sympathize with the abolitionist cause, but how is my boycotting sugar going to change the lot of a West Indian slave? That said, I might join in a boycott if it was truly a mass movement that had potential to influence the slave economy.
Slavery is undoubtedly evil, but Parliament and the Royal Navy are responsible for eradicating it, not me.
I would cast off all my worldly possessions, including my supplies of cursed imperialist salt, and join the Mahatma's march.
In the privacy of my own home, I would strongly support the Mahatma's brave stand. I would probably keep my supply of monopoly salt, however. Waste not, want not!
Eating a balanced, healthy diet is much more important to me than supporting a symbolic consumer campaign, however worthy. Pass the salt!
As much as I like Paul Simon’s music, a successful boycott depends on universal compliance so I would not buy the album.
Tough one. While I support the boycott, Graceland helped a number of black South African musicians build careers in the West. I would buy the album with some conflicted feelings.
Seriously? Simon made a beautiful album featuring black South African musicians who freely chose to work with him. I’ll buy it and dance in the aisles at the concert!
Sign me up! I think the industrial food complex is bad for farmers, bad for human health, and bad for the planet.
Not so fast. Organic food is a nice luxury for wealthy liberals, but we can’t feed the exploding global population without industrial food production, including fast food.
Thanks anyway, but I’ll pass on that heirloom tomato. I happen to like the taste and convenience of fast food, and I don’t see why I should feel guilty about that.
I’m happy to pay more money for products from farmers and artisans who are treated with respect by their trading partners and paid a fair price for their goods.
I might get a warm, fuzzy feeling by paying a little extra for that pound of fair-trade coffee now and then, but I can’t blow up my budget to subsidize a grand social experiment.
I base my purchasing decisions on quality, convenience, and price, period.
I would never buy a diamond unless I was absolutely certain that it was not a conflict diamond.
Nobody wants to see their engagement ring purchase subsidize a genocidal warlord, but the Kimberly Process is deeply flawed by corruption and poor enforcement mechanisms. I would buy from a reputable retailer and hope for the best.
I choose diamonds based on clarity, color, cut, and weight. The global diamond supply chain is an issue for police and customs officials, not me.
I would applaud the regulator’s efforts and decline to buy toys from any company with stone-age notions of gender.
I think children should play with whatever toys they like, within reason. But short of a consumer safety issue, I don’t think the government should tell private companies how to market their products.
The Swedish regulatory action sounds like political correctness run amok. I would happily buy toys from the old catalogue with its perfectly sound marketing strategy based on natural, innate differences in the tastes and propensities of boys and girls.